CASE FILE ENTRY // MATERIAL FAILURE LOG

Every defect has a story.

These case studies are fictionalized representations of real challenges I encountered in high-precision forging environments. Under the guidance of corporate metallurgists and NDT technicians, I traced failures back to their rootsβ€”investigating metallurgical issues like voids, porosity, and inclusionsβ€”and evaluated non-destructive testing methods and process flow.

Each reconstruction reflects how I approached failure analysis from the ground up, turning anomalies into actionable engineering insight, while protecting confidential data under NDA through abstracted technical storytelling.

⚠️ Note: These visuals are educational reconstructionsβ€”built to show the logic, not the client.

🧩 Subsurface Void Investigation – Aluminum Alloy

Objective: Investigate dimensional shifts observed during machining; metallographic analysis revealed a subsurface void near the material boundary.

Material: Aluminum alloy (simulated for demonstration purposes)

Methodology: Cross-sectioned the sample, followed by metallographic polishing and 20x objective lens inspection.

Findings:

  • πŸ•³οΈ Identified a void approximately 0.0004 in in diameter.
  • πŸ“ Located near the outer boundaryβ€”suggesting origin during casting or rolling stages.

Outcome: Findings were used to revise process control parameters for billet manufacturing to prevent future defects.

πŸ§ͺ Metallographic Simulations β€” Aluminum Alloy

🟀 Subsurface Void Investigation β€” Aluminum Alloy

  • Objective: Investigate machining shifts; voids found near the material boundary.
  • Material: Aluminum alloy (simulated)
  • Methodology: Cross-sectioned, polished, and examined under 20x lens

Findings:

  • Void approx. 0.0004 in wide
  • Located near outer edge β€” likely formed during casting or rolling

Outcome: Helped adjust process control parameters for billet manufacturing.

Subsurface Void

Void width β‰ˆ 0.0004 in | 20x objective lens

βšͺ Simulated Metallographic Analysis β€” Hydrogen Porosity

This simulated aluminum sample shows a rounded void near the boundary, consistent with hydrogen porosity.

  • Magnification: 20x objective lens
  • Void diameter: ~0.0006 in
  • Observation: Typical of gas entrapment during solidification
Hydrogen Porosity Simulation

Porosity width β‰ˆ 0.0006 in | 20x objective lens

πŸ§ͺ This example is for educational use only and does not reflect proprietary data.

🧫 Simulated Gas Void β€” Alternate Morphology

This simulation represents a variation in hydrogen or gas porosity, featuring a more elongated or asymmetrical internal void β€” a pattern sometimes seen in solidification shrinkage or entrapped gas migration during cooling.

  • Magnification: 20x objective lens
  • Void type: Elongated/collapsed bubble morphology
  • Use case: Failure analysis or process QA
Alternate Gas Void Simulation

Void feature | 20x objective lens

πŸ§ͺ This micrograph is a simulation for educational and display purposes only.

⚠️ All visuals are fictionalized simulations and are NDA-safe educational content.

πŸ’» Corrosion Comparison Dashboard

⚫ Pitting Corrosion β€” 6261-T6 Aluminum

Localized corrosion initiating at microstructural transitions in heat-treated aluminum alloys.

πŸ“ Pit size: 41.2 Β΅m Γ— 16.6 Β΅m
πŸ” Key cue: Irregular, isolated pit with clean matrix around it

Pitting Corrosion 6261-T6
  • Magnification: 20x
  • Common location: Grain boundaries and heat-affected zones

This is a simulated micrograph. Educational use only.

🟠 Surface Corrosion β€” 304 Stainless Steel

Uniform corrosion degrading the surface evenly over time.

πŸ“ Depth: ~54.9 Β΅m
🌊 Profile: Shallow, smooth, widespread etching

Surface Corrosion Steel
  • Magnification: 20x
  • Cause: Breakdown of chromium-rich oxide layer

Represents typical stainless degradation seen in industrial or outdoor environments.

πŸ”΅ Advanced Surface Attack β€” Steel Alloy

Severe corrosion progressing into material with jagged morphology.

πŸ“ Width: ~129.5 Β΅m
⚠️ Visual cue: Uneven edges, aggressive front

Advanced Steel Attack
  • Magnification: 20x
  • Cause: Coating failure + mechanical stress + electrolyte entrapment

High-risk failure pattern in structural steelβ€”requires early detection and barrier reinforcement.

πŸ“Š Quick Comparison Table

Material Corrosion Type Depth / Width Visual Cue Severity
6261-T6 Aluminum Pitting Corrosion ~41 ¡m x 17 ¡m Isolated irregular pits ⚠️ Medium
304 Stainless Steel Surface Corrosion ~54.9 ¡m Smooth, shallow etch ⚠️ Low
Steel Alloy Advanced Surface Attack ~129.5 ¡m Jagged edges, trenching 🚨 High

Data is representative of simulated metallography. For technical visualization only.

πŸ”¬ Alpha Case in Titanium – Root Cause & Visuals

Alpha case is a brittle, oxygen-enriched surface layer found in titanium alloys after high-temperature exposure. It must be minimized in aerospace and critical applications.

  • Material: Ti-6Al-4V
  • Cause: Overheating due to equipment failure and double striking
  • Observed Thickness: ~0.0016 in
  • Issue Timeline: Strike Event (8/26/24) β†’ Heater Malfunction (9/9/24)

Preventive Measures:

  • Real-time thermocouples on dies and slugs
  • Vacuum or argon-shielded heat treatment
  • Post-process removal via grinding or chemical milling
Alpha Case Sample 1 Alpha Case Sample 2 Alpha Case Sample 3 Alpha Case Sample 4

Simulated metallographic inspection for demonstration. Based on WO640358 internal review data.

πŸ§ͺ Test Method Overview

Samples were prepared through standard metallographic polishing techniques and inspected using a 20x objective lens. These visuals are reconstructed simulations based on typical alpha case behavior in titanium forgings.

  • Cross-sectioned post-forge billets (Ti-6Al-4V)
  • Polished with 600–1200 grit, then etched
  • Captured under LED illumination and scaled

These simulations are NDA-compliant and built to illustrate failure logic, not specific data.

πŸ› οΈ Alpha Case Prevention Tips

  • βœ… Ensure full argon shielding or vacuum heating
  • βœ… Avoid thermal overshoot by monitoring induction frequency
  • βœ… Remove case post-forge with light grinding or chemical etching
  • βœ… Avoid dry hits during setup – this accelerates oxidation

Note: Alpha case is common but must stay under 0.0015–0.0020 in for aerospace applications.

βš–οΈ Alpha Case vs. Pitting β€” Key Differences

Trait Alpha Case Pitting
Location Outer oxidized rim Local surface voids
Cause Oxygen diffusion during heating Gas entrapment, stress, or contamination
Visual Cue Discolored band, no cavity Sharp-edged pit or void
Fix Grind/etch + improve shielding Improve melt quality or inspection